The concept of 'environmental justice' has evolved significantly since its inception in the 1980s, when it primarily addressed the disproportionate burden of pollution borne by minority and low-income communities in the United States. Over time, the framework has expanded to encompass global dimensions, including climate change impacts on developing nations and the transboundary movement of hazardous waste. Scholars argue that environmental justice now requires a multidimensional approach, integrating social equity, ecological sustainability, and economic viability. However, critics contend that the broadening of the term risks diluting its original focus on racial and class disparities, potentially undermining targeted policy interventions. Despite this debate, the core principle remains: no community should bear an unjust share of environmental harms, and all populations deserve equitable access to environmental benefits and decision-making processes.
❓ According to the passage, what is a primary concern raised by critics regarding the evolution of environmental justice?
A. The term has become too narrowly focused on racial disparities.
B. The expansion of the concept may weaken its original emphasis on specific social inequalities.
C. Environmental justice now ignores the impact of climate change on developing nations.
D. The framework has failed to incorporate economic considerations.
✅ Correct Answer
B. B) The expansion of the concept may weaken its original emphasis on specific social inequalities.