As the proportion of elderly populations continues to rise in many major cities worldwide, one perspective holds that governments should prioritize limited public resources toward improving healthcare and welfare facilities for older adults, rather than investing in leisure and educational programs aimed at younger generations. However, others insist that neglecting the needs of the younger generation will undermine a city's long-term innovative vitality, ultimately eroding the well-being of society as a whole. Given that budgets cannot fully meet the demands of both generations simultaneously, how do you believe urban policymakers should balance this intergenerational resource allocation dilemma? Please articulate your stance, providing specific reasons and examples to support your argument.
