As global warming intensifies, many countries are pouring substantial financial resources into the research and development of carbon capture and storage technologies, rather than directly reducing fossil fuel use. However, critics argue that this bet on "future technologies" is far less practical than immediately scaling up existing renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power. In your country, which environmental strategy do you believe the government should prioritize funding—high-risk carbon capture technologies, or the expansion of proven clean energy? Please articulate your position, supported by specific reasons and examples.
