As artificial intelligence increasingly permeates critical domains such as recruitment, healthcare, and the judiciary, some argue that relying on algorithms to make decisions affecting human destinies will yield more efficient and equitable outcomes, while others worry that beneath this veneer of "rationality" lie unaccountable biases and indifference. To what extent do you believe the role of artificial intelligence in consequential decision-making should be strictly constrained? Please articulate your position and support your argument with specific examples from relevant fields.
