Faced with the global climate crisis, many governments are promoting "carbon budget" systems that set strict annual caps on individual carbon emissions, with excessive emissions requiring hefty fees. However, critics argue that such policies could exacerbate social inequality, as the wealthy can always pay to maintain high-carbon lifestyles, while lower-income individuals are forced to bear more restrictions. Do you believe that personal carbon rationing is the fairest and most effective approach to tackling climate change, or should priority be given to collective measures such as taxing large corporations and restricting industrial emissions? Please state your position and support it with specific reasons and examples.
