In the field of resource conservation, policymakers in a country often face a dilemma: they must ensure current economic growth and the livelihood needs of the people, while also reserving sufficient natural resources for future generations. However, when some ecologists argue that "to preserve nature, strict caps should be set on the extraction of non-renewable resources," other economists counter that "excessive restrictions will stifle innovation and employment, and in turn delay the adoption of clean technologies." Faced with this contradiction, in formulating a national resource strategy, should the government prioritize the arguments of which side? Please state your clear position and support your argument with specific reasons and examples.
