As artificial intelligence technology becomes increasingly prevalent in critical decision-making domains such as hiring, loan approvals, and criminal justice, algorithmic bias is emerging as a growing social concern. However, when asked whether these decisions should be made entirely by humans, public opinion is sharply divided: one camp argues that the inherent data biases in algorithms render them incapable of achieving true fairness, while the other firmly believes that artificial intelligence can eliminate the subjective emotions and systemic discrimination present in human decision-making. After weighing the ethical costs of algorithmic efficiency against human judgment, which party—humans or machines—should bear the ultimate responsibility for final decisions? Please articulate your position and support your argument with concrete examples.
