Faced with the urgent reality of continuously rising global temperatures, some countries advocate for imposing hefty carbon taxes to forcibly constrain the emission behaviors of businesses and individuals, while others lean toward investing in green technology innovation and subsidies, believing this can more effectively achieve emission reduction goals without stifling economic growth. Under conditions of limited resources, which strategy do you believe should become the primary choice for nations in addressing climate change? Please articulate your position, and support your argument with specific reasons and examples.