The extinction of the passenger pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius) in the early 20th century has long been attributed to overhunting by humans. However, recent research suggests that the species' demise was primarily driven by natural factors, particularly its extreme social behavior and genetic vulnerability. Three main arguments support this view. First, passenger pigeons bred in massive, dense colonies, sometimes containing millions of birds. This breeding strategy made them highly susceptible to sudden environmental disturbances, such as storms or disease outbreaks, which could wipe out entire colonies in a single season. Second, genetic analyses of museum specimens reveal that the passenger pigeon had remarkably low genetic diversity, even when its population was at its peak. This lack of variation meant the species was poorly equipped to adapt to changing conditions or resist novel pathogens. Third, the pigeon's reliance on mast crops—acorns and beechnuts—was highly unpredictable. During years when these food sources failed, the pigeons faced starvation and reproductive failure, and such natural boom-and-bust cycles could have driven the population to a critical threshold even without human interference.
🎧 听力讲座
🎯 模拟考试环境：先点「播放讲座」听完内容，再作答。听力原文默认隐藏。
The lecturer challenges the reading's claim that natural factors were the primary cause of the passenger pigeon's extinction. While acknowledging the species' colonial breeding and low genetic diversity, the professor argues that these traits were not fatal until humans exacerbated them. First, the reading overlooks the scale and intensity of commercial hunting in the 19th century. Historical records show that hunters used nets, guns, and even sulfur fires to kill millions of pigeons annually, targeting breeding colonies. This relentless slaughter, not natural disturbances, was the decisive factor that prevented the pigeons from recovering. Second, the low genetic diversity cited in the reading did not doom the species; many species with low diversity, such as the cheetah, survive today. The real problem was that hunting reduced the population to such small, scattered groups that they could no longer form the dense colonies essential for their breeding success. Without the safety of numbers, they became even more vulnerable to the natural disasters mentioned. Third, while mast crop failures did occur, they were a recurring phenomenon that pigeons had historically survived. The fatal blow came when hunting removed the buffer of large populations, making each food shortage catastrophic. In sum, the lecture concludes that human overhunting, not intrinsic natural weakness, was the primary cause of extinction.
📝 写作提示 Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
