The extinction of the woolly mammoth has long been attributed to human overhunting, but recent evidence suggests that climate change was the primary driver. First, the timing of mammoth decline correlates with the end of the last Ice Age, when temperatures rose dramatically. As glaciers retreated, the vast grasslands known as the mammoth steppe shrank, reducing their primary food source. Second, genetic studies show that mammoth populations experienced severe bottlenecks before humans arrived in large numbers in Siberia and North America. These bottlenecks indicate that climate-induced habitat fragmentation had already weakened the species. Third, archaeological evidence reveals that human hunting tools and kill sites are rare compared to other megafauna, suggesting that humans did not exert sufficient hunting pressure to cause extinction. Instead, the warming climate likely led to a loss of suitable habitat, pushing mammoths to extinction.
🎧 听力讲座
🎯 模拟考试环境：先点「播放讲座」听完内容，再作答。听力原文默认隐藏。
The lecture challenges the reading's claim that climate change was the main cause of mammoth extinction. While the timing of climate change is cited, human arrival often coincided with the final extinction events on each landmass. For example, on Wrangel Island, mammoths survived until about 4,000 years ago, long after the climate had warmed, but disappeared shortly after human settlers arrived. Regarding genetic bottlenecks, the reading overlooks that such bottlenecks also occurred during earlier warm periods when mammoths did not go extinct, implying that climate alone was not sufficient. Moreover, the scarcity of kill sites is not proof of low hunting pressure; humans may have used organic tools that rotted, or they may have hunted juvenile mammoths, leaving fewer identifiable remains. Additionally, indirect human impacts, such as habitat modification through fire or the introduction of diseases, could have been devastating. Thus, the lecture concludes that human activity, not climate, was the decisive factor.
📝 写作提示 Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
