The extinction of the megafauna—large animals such as mammoths, giant sloths, and saber-toothed cats—at the end of the Pleistocene epoch has long puzzled scientists. While many theories exist, the most compelling explanation is overhunting by early humans. First, archaeological evidence shows that human arrival in new regions often coincides with rapid megafauna decline. For example, in North America, the Clovis culture appeared around 13,000 years ago, and within a few hundred years, most large mammals vanished. Second, megafauna species were particularly vulnerable to hunting due to their slow reproduction rates and large body sizes, which made them easy targets and unable to recover from population losses. Third, climate change at the end of the ice age, though significant, cannot fully account for the extinctions because similar climatic shifts had occurred in previous interglacial periods without causing such dramatic losses. Thus, human predation, not climate, was the primary driver of these ancient extinctions.
🎧 听力讲座
🎯 模拟考试环境：先点「播放讲座」听完内容，再作答。听力原文默认隐藏。
The reading's claim that human overhunting caused megafauna extinction is not convincing. First, the timing argument is flawed. In many regions, humans coexisted with megafauna for thousands of years before extinction. For instance, in Australia, humans arrived at least 50,000 years ago, yet most megafauna disappeared only about 20,000 years later—a long lag that contradicts a direct overhunting link. Second, the vulnerability of megafauna is overstated. Many large animals, such as elephants, have survived alongside human hunters for centuries in Africa and Asia, suggesting that size and slow reproduction are not inherently fatal. Third, climate change cannot be dismissed. High-resolution ice core data reveal that the end of the Pleistocene featured abrupt and extreme temperature swings, far more severe than earlier interglacial shifts. These rapid changes would have disrupted vegetation and water sources, placing enormous stress on large animals. Therefore, the evidence points to a complex mix, with climate likely playing a more critical role than the reading acknowledges.
📝 ライティング指示 Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
📊 TOEFL Integrated Writing Rubric
Content Accuracy: Accurately capture the relationship between lecture and reading
Information Completeness: Cover all key counter-arguments from the lecture
Structure & Coherence: Logical organization and progression
Language Use: Grammar, vocabulary, expression accuracy
Scored 0-30 based on holistic scoring (original 0-5, scaled to 30).
