The extinction of the dinosaurs at the end of the Cretaceous period has long been attributed to a massive asteroid impact. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that volcanic activity, specifically the Deccan Traps eruptions in India, was the primary driver. First, the timing of the Deccan Traps eruptions overlaps with the extinction event. Radioisotopic dating places the main phase of eruptions at about 66 million years ago, precisely when the dinosaurs disappeared. This temporal correlation suggests a causal link. Second, volcanic emissions of sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide would have caused severe climate changes, including rapid cooling (volcanic winter) followed by prolonged warming, which could have disrupted ecosystems globally. Such climate fluctuations are consistent with the fossil record showing gradual declines in dinosaur diversity before the impact. Third, the asteroid impact hypothesis fails to explain the selective nature of the extinction—many terrestrial species survived, while others, like dinosaurs, perished. Volcanic activity, by contrast, would have had more widespread and sustained effects on the atmosphere and oceans, affecting different species unevenly but over a longer period, matching the observed patterns.
🎧 听力讲座
🎯 模拟考试环境：先点「播放讲座」听完内容，再作答。听力原文默认隐藏。
The reading presents a compelling case for volcanic activity, but it overlooks critical evidence that strongly supports the asteroid impact theory. First, the timing argument is not as clean as it seems. While the main Deccan eruptions began around 66 million years ago, recent high-precision dating shows that the most intense volcanic phase occurred about 200,000 years before the extinction horizon, and the eruptions continued for another 500,000 years after. The mass extinction happened abruptly, within a very short geological instant, which aligns with a sudden event like an asteroid impact, not a prolonged volcanic episode. Second, the climate changes from volcanic emissions would have been severe, but they were not unique; similar large igneous provinces in Earth's history did not cause mass extinctions of this magnitude. In contrast, the asteroid impact would have generated an immediate global fireball, tsunamis, and a dust cloud that blocked sunlight for months, causing a rapid collapse of photosynthesis—a scenario that better explains the sudden disappearance of dinosaurs. Third, the selectivity argument is misleading. The asteroid impact would have caused a 'nuclear winter' that favored small, burrowing, or aquatic animals that could survive with minimal food, while large, specialized species like dinosaurs were more vulnerable. This matches the fossil record where many small mammals and crocodilians survived. Thus, the impact theory remains the most robust explanation.
📝 写作提示 Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
