As global temperatures continue to rise and extreme weather events become more frequent, some argue that nations should invest heavily in high-tech solutions such as carbon capture and geological storage to directly remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Others, however, contend that the same resources, if channeled into large-scale afforestation, mangrove protection, and peatland conservation—nature-based solutions—could address the climate crisis more cost-effectively. In your view, which path—expensive human-engineered interventions or the protection and restoration of natural ecosystems—should take precedence as the top priority for future global climate action? Please provide your reasoning and support your position with concrete examples.
